diff --git a/patches/api/Legacy-data-should-look-for-legacy-materials.patch b/patches/api/Legacy-data-should-look-for-legacy-materials.patch new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..9fdd2b7c00 --- /dev/null +++ b/patches/api/Legacy-data-should-look-for-legacy-materials.patch @@ -0,0 +1,19 @@ +From 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 +From: Shane Freeder <theboyetronic@gmail.com> +Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2021 09:26:06 +0100 +Subject: [PATCH] Legacy data should look for legacy materials + + +diff --git a/src/main/java/org/bukkit/inventory/ItemStack.java b/src/main/java/org/bukkit/inventory/ItemStack.java +index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..0000000000000000000000000000000000000000 100644 +--- a/src/main/java/org/bukkit/inventory/ItemStack.java ++++ b/src/main/java/org/bukkit/inventory/ItemStack.java +@@ -0,0 +0,0 @@ public class ItemStack implements Cloneable, ConfigurationSerializable, net.kyor + + Material type; + if (version < 0) { +- type = Material.getMaterial(Material.LEGACY_PREFIX + (String) args.get("type")); ++ type = Material.getMaterial(Material.LEGACY_PREFIX + (String) args.get("type"), true); + + byte dataVal = (type != null && type.getMaxDurability() == 0) ? (byte) damage : 0; // Actually durable items get a 0 passed into conversion + type = Bukkit.getUnsafe().fromLegacy(new MaterialData(type, dataVal), true);