PaperMC/Spigot-Server-Patches/0198-Remove-CraftScheduler-Async-Task-Debugger.patch
Zach Brown 6f2009754d
Stop explicitly blocking Vanilla Method Profiler
At the time this was re-added, there was concern around how the JIT
would handle the system property that enabled it.

This shouldn't be a problem, and as such we no longer need to block
access to it.

The Vanilla Method Profiler will not provide much to most users however
there is no harm in providing it as an option. For most users, the
recommended and supported method for determining performance issues with
Paper will continue to be Timings.
2018-03-31 14:55:42 -04:00

62 lines
3.2 KiB
Diff

From 52882fe0e3db0ad65c6f46e7902d9b570db2ccac Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Aikar <aikar@aikar.co>
Date: Sun, 5 Feb 2017 00:04:04 -0500
Subject: [PATCH] Remove CraftScheduler Async Task Debugger
I have not once ever seen this system help debug a crash.
One report of a suspected memory leak with the system.
This adds additional overhead to asynchronous task dispatching
diff --git a/src/main/java/org/bukkit/craftbukkit/scheduler/CraftScheduler.java b/src/main/java/org/bukkit/craftbukkit/scheduler/CraftScheduler.java
index 200d1ee7..cc4a256c 100644
--- a/src/main/java/org/bukkit/craftbukkit/scheduler/CraftScheduler.java
+++ b/src/main/java/org/bukkit/craftbukkit/scheduler/CraftScheduler.java
@@ -80,8 +80,8 @@ public class CraftScheduler implements BukkitScheduler {
private final ConcurrentHashMap<Integer, CraftTask> runners = new ConcurrentHashMap<Integer, CraftTask>();
private volatile int currentTick = -1;
private final Executor executor = Executors.newCachedThreadPool(new com.google.common.util.concurrent.ThreadFactoryBuilder().setNameFormat("Craft Scheduler Thread - %1$d").build()); // Spigot
- private CraftAsyncDebugger debugHead = new CraftAsyncDebugger(-1, null, null) {@Override StringBuilder debugTo(StringBuilder string) {return string;}};
- private CraftAsyncDebugger debugTail = debugHead;
+ //private CraftAsyncDebugger debugHead = new CraftAsyncDebugger(-1, null, null) {@Override StringBuilder debugTo(StringBuilder string) {return string;}}; // Paper
+ //private CraftAsyncDebugger debugTail = debugHead; // Paper
private static final int RECENT_TICKS;
static {
@@ -371,7 +371,7 @@ public class CraftScheduler implements BukkitScheduler {
}
parsePending();
} else {
- debugTail = debugTail.setNext(new CraftAsyncDebugger(currentTick + RECENT_TICKS, task.getOwner(), task.getTaskClass()));
+ //debugTail = debugTail.setNext(new CraftAsyncDebugger(currentTick + RECENT_TICKS, task.getOwner(), task.getTaskClass())); // Paper
executor.execute(new ServerSchedulerReportingWrapper(task)); // Paper
// We don't need to parse pending
// (async tasks must live with race-conditions if they attempt to cancel between these few lines of code)
@@ -388,7 +388,7 @@ public class CraftScheduler implements BukkitScheduler {
pending.addAll(temp);
temp.clear();
MinecraftTimings.bukkitSchedulerFinishTimer.stopTiming();
- debugHead = debugHead.getNextHead(currentTick);
+ //debugHead = debugHead.getNextHead(currentTick); // Paper
}
private void addTask(final CraftTask task) {
@@ -447,10 +447,15 @@ public class CraftScheduler implements BukkitScheduler {
@Override
public String toString() {
+ // Paper start
+ return "";
+ /*
int debugTick = currentTick;
StringBuilder string = new StringBuilder("Recent tasks from ").append(debugTick - RECENT_TICKS).append('-').append(debugTick).append('{');
debugHead.debugTo(string);
return string.append('}').toString();
+ */
+ // Paper end
}
@Deprecated
--
2.14.3