PaperMC/patches/server/0546-Synchronize-PalettedContainer-instead-of-ThreadingDe.patch
Bjarne Koll c5a10665b8
Remove wall-time / unused skip tick protection (#11412)
Spigot still maintains some partial implementation of "tick skipping", a
practice in which the MinecraftServer.currentTick field is updated not
by an increment of one per actual tick, but instead set to
System.currentTimeMillis() / 50. This behaviour means that the tracked
tick may "skip" a tick value in case a previous tick took more than the
expected 50ms.

To compensate for this in important paths, spigot/craftbukkit
implements "wall-time". Instead of incrementing/decrementing ticks on
block entities/entities by one for each call to their tick() method,
they instead increment/decrement important values, like
an ItemEntity's age or pickupDelay, by the difference of
`currentTick - lastTick`, where `lastTick` is the value of
`currentTick` during the last tick() call.

These "fixes" however do not play nicely with minecraft's simulation
distance as entities/block entities implementing the above behaviour
would "catch up" their values when moving from a non-ticking chunk to a
ticking one as their `lastTick` value remains stuck on the last tick in
a ticking chunk and hence lead to a large "catch up" once ticked again.

Paper completely removes the "tick skipping" behaviour (See patch
"Further-improve-server-tick-loop"), making the above precautions
completely unnecessary, which also rids paper of the previous described
incompatibility with non-ticking chunks.
2024-09-19 16:36:07 +02:00

91 lines
4.2 KiB
Diff

From 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Aikar <aikar@aikar.co>
Date: Fri, 29 May 2020 20:29:02 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] Synchronize PalettedContainer instead of
ThreadingDetector/Semaphore
Mojang has flaws in their logic about chunks being concurrently
wrote to. So we constantly see crashes around multiple threads writing.
Additionally, java has optimized synchronization so well that its
in many times faster than trying to manage read write locks for low
contention situations.
And this is extremely a low contention situation.
diff --git a/src/main/java/net/minecraft/world/level/chunk/PalettedContainer.java b/src/main/java/net/minecraft/world/level/chunk/PalettedContainer.java
index 2e5afbd2a69c4eeabd9a48bff6a37a7004565716..2fa0097a9374a89177e4f1068d1bfed30b8ff122 100644
--- a/src/main/java/net/minecraft/world/level/chunk/PalettedContainer.java
+++ b/src/main/java/net/minecraft/world/level/chunk/PalettedContainer.java
@@ -30,14 +30,14 @@ public class PalettedContainer<T> implements PaletteResize<T>, PalettedContainer
public final IdMap<T> registry;
private volatile PalettedContainer.Data<T> data;
private final PalettedContainer.Strategy strategy;
- private final ThreadingDetector threadingDetector = new ThreadingDetector("PalettedContainer");
+ // private final ThreadingDetector threadingDetector = new ThreadingDetector("PalettedContainer"); // Paper - unused
public void acquire() {
- this.threadingDetector.checkAndLock();
+ // this.threadingDetector.checkAndLock(); // Paper - disable this - use proper synchronization
}
public void release() {
- this.threadingDetector.checkAndUnlock();
+ // this.threadingDetector.checkAndUnlock(); // Paper - disable this
}
public static <T> Codec<PalettedContainer<T>> codecRW(IdMap<T> idList, Codec<T> entryCodec, PalettedContainer.Strategy paletteProvider, T defaultValue) {
@@ -104,7 +104,7 @@ public class PalettedContainer<T> implements PaletteResize<T>, PalettedContainer
}
@Override
- public int onResize(int newBits, T object) {
+ public synchronized int onResize(int newBits, T object) { // Paper - synchronize
PalettedContainer.Data<T> data = this.data;
PalettedContainer.Data<T> data2 = this.createOrReuseData(data, newBits);
data2.copyFrom(data.palette, data.storage);
@@ -129,7 +129,7 @@ public class PalettedContainer<T> implements PaletteResize<T>, PalettedContainer
return this.getAndSet(this.strategy.getIndex(x, y, z), value);
}
- private T getAndSet(int index, T value) {
+ private synchronized T getAndSet(int index, T value) { // Paper - synchronize
int i = this.data.palette.idFor(value);
int j = this.data.storage.getAndSet(index, i);
return this.data.palette.valueFor(j);
@@ -145,7 +145,7 @@ public class PalettedContainer<T> implements PaletteResize<T>, PalettedContainer
}
}
- private void set(int index, T value) {
+ private synchronized void set(int index, T value) { // Paper - synchronize
int i = this.data.palette.idFor(value);
this.data.storage.set(index, i);
}
@@ -168,7 +168,7 @@ public class PalettedContainer<T> implements PaletteResize<T>, PalettedContainer
intSet.forEach(id -> action.accept(palette.valueFor(id)));
}
- public void read(FriendlyByteBuf buf) {
+ public synchronized void read(FriendlyByteBuf buf) { // Paper - synchronize
this.acquire();
try {
@@ -183,7 +183,7 @@ public class PalettedContainer<T> implements PaletteResize<T>, PalettedContainer
}
@Override
- public void write(FriendlyByteBuf buf) {
+ public synchronized void write(FriendlyByteBuf buf) { // Paper - synchronize
this.acquire();
try {
@@ -231,7 +231,7 @@ public class PalettedContainer<T> implements PaletteResize<T>, PalettedContainer
}
@Override
- public PalettedContainerRO.PackedData<T> pack(IdMap<T> idList, PalettedContainer.Strategy paletteProvider) {
+ public synchronized PalettedContainerRO.PackedData<T> pack(IdMap<T> idList, PalettedContainer.Strategy paletteProvider) { // Paper - synchronize
this.acquire();
PalettedContainerRO.PackedData var12;