From dd88a6b1bb4278113b48c49ecb56042fbe8c75b9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: GitHub Action Date: Sat, 3 Dec 2022 13:00:16 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] Update content of files --- data/web/blogfork.telegram.org/mtproto.html | 91 ++++++++------------- data/web/core.telegram.org/mtproto.html | 91 ++++++++------------- data/web/corefork.telegram.org/mtproto.html | 91 ++++++++------------- 3 files changed, 96 insertions(+), 177 deletions(-) diff --git a/data/web/blogfork.telegram.org/mtproto.html b/data/web/blogfork.telegram.org/mtproto.html index eb886c48ea..42350a706f 100644 --- a/data/web/blogfork.telegram.org/mtproto.html +++ b/data/web/blogfork.telegram.org/mtproto.html @@ -47,45 +47,24 @@ Client developers are required to comply with the Security…">
-

Please feel free to check out our FAQ for the Technically Inclined. -Client developers are required to comply with the Security Guidelines.

+

Please feel free to check out our FAQ for the Technically Inclined.
Client developers are required to comply with the Security Guidelines.

-

Related articles

+

Related articles

@@ -94,7 +73,7 @@ Client developers are required to comply with the Secret Chats, end-to-end-encryption
  • End-to-end encrypted Voice Calls
    • -

    General Description

    +

    General Description

    The protocol is designed for access to a server API from applications running on mobile devices. It must be emphasized that a web browser is not such an application.

    The protocol is subdivided into three virtually independent components:

    +
    -

    As of version 4.6, major Telegram clients are using MTProto 2.0, described in this article. -MTProto v1.0 (described here for reference) is deprecated and is currently being phased out.

    +

    As of version 4.6, major Telegram clients are using MTProto 2.0, described in this article.
    MTProto v1.0 (described here for reference) is deprecated and is currently being phased out.

    -

    Brief Component Summary

    -

    High-Level Component (RPC Query Language/API)

    +

    Brief Component Summary

    +

    High-Level Component (RPC Query Language/API)

    From the standpoint of the high-level component, the client and the server exchange messages inside a session. The session is attached to the client device (the application, to be more exact) rather than a specific websocket/http/https/tcp connection. In addition, each session is attached to a user key ID by which authorization is actually accomplished.

    Several connections to a server may be open; messages may be sent in either direction through any of the connections (a response to a query is not necessarily returned through the same connection that carried the original query, although most often, that is the case; however, in no case can a message be returned through a connection belonging to a different session). When the UDP protocol is used, a response might be returned by a different IP address than the one to which the query had been sent.

    There are several types of messages:

    @@ -125,23 +104,18 @@ MTProto v1.0 (described here for reference) is depreca

    Each message, either individual or inside a container, consists of a message identifier (64 bits, see below), a message sequence number within a session (32 bits), the length (of the message body in bytes; 32 bits), and a body (any size which is a multiple of 4 bytes). In addition, when a container or a single message is sent, an internal header is added at the top (see below), then the entire message is encrypted, and an external header is placed at the top of the message (a 64-bit key identifier and a 128-bit message key).

    A message body normally consists of a 32-bit message type followed by type-dependent parameters. In particular, each RPC function has a corresponding message type. For more detail, see Binary Data Serialization, Mobile Protocol: Service Messages.

    All numbers are written as little endian. However, very large numbers (2048-bit) used in RSA and DH are written in the big endian format because that is how the OpenSSL library does it.

    -

    Authorization and Encryption

    +

    Authorization and Encryption

    Prior to a message (or a multipart message) being transmitted over a network using a transport protocol, it is encrypted in a certain way, and an external header is added at the top of the message which is: a 64-bit key identifier (that uniquely identifies an authorization key for the server as well as the user) and a 128-bit message key. A user key together with the message key defines an actual 256-bit key which is what encrypts the message using AES-256 encryption. Note that the initial part of the message to be encrypted contains variable data (session, message ID, sequence number, server salt) that obviously influences the message key (and thus the AES key and iv). The message key is defined as the 128 middle bits of the SHA256 of the message body (including session, message ID, etc.), including the padding bytes, prepended by 32 bytes taken from the authorization key. Multipart messages are encrypted as a single message.

    For a technical specification, see Mobile Protocol: Detailed Description

    The first thing a client application must do is create an authorization key which is normally generated when it is first run and almost never changes.

    -

    The protocol's principal drawback is that an intruder passively intercepting messages and then somehow appropriating the authorization key (for example, by stealing a device) will be able to decrypt all the intercepted messages post factum. This probably is not too much of a problem (by stealing a device, one could also gain access to all the information cached on the device without decrypting anything); however, the following steps could be taken to overcome this weakness:

    - -

    Time Synchronization

    -

    If client time diverges widely from server time, a server may start ignoring client messages, or vice versa, because of an invalid message identifier (which is closely related to creation time). Under these circumstances, the server will send the client a special message containing the correct time and a certain 128-bit salt (either explicitly provided by the client in a special RPC synchronization request or equal to the key of the latest message received from the client during the current session). This message could be the first one in a container that includes other messages (if the time discrepancy is significant but does not as yet result in the client's messages being ignored).

    -

    Having received such a message or a container holding it, the client first performs a time synchronization (in effect, simply storing the difference between the server's time and its own to be able to compute the “correct” time in the future) and then verifies that the message identifiers for correctness.

    +

    To prevent attackers potentially intercepting encrypted messages from decrypting them post factum by somehow appropriating the authorization key (for example, by stealing a device – even though in that case one could also gain access to all the information cached on the device without decrypting anything), MTProto supports Perfect Forward Secrecy in both cloud chats and secret chats.

    +

    Time Synchronization

    +

    If client time diverges widely from server time, a server may start ignoring client messages, or vice versa, because of an invalid message identifier (which is closely related to creation time). Under these circumstances, the server will send the client a special message containing the correct time and a certain 128-bit salt (either explicitly provided by the client in a special RPC synchronization request or equal to the key of the latest message received from the client during the current session). This message could be the first one in a container that includes other messages (if the time discrepancy is significant but does not as yet result in the client's messages being ignored).

    +

    Having received such a message or a container holding it, the client first performs a time synchronization (in effect, simply storing the difference between the server's time and its own to be able to compute the “correct” time in the future) and then verifies that the message identifiers for correctness.

    Where a correction has been neglected, the client will have to generate a new session to assure the monotonicity of message identifiers.

    -

    MTProto transport

    +

    MTProto transport

    Before being sent using the selected transport protocol, the payload has to be wrapped in a secondary protocol header, defined by the appropriate MTProto transport protocol.

    -

    The server recognizes these different protocols (and distinguishes them from HTTP, too) by the header. -Additionally, the following transport features can be used:

    +

    The server recognizes these different protocols (and distinguishes them from HTTP, too) by the header.
    Additionally, the following transport features can be used:

    Example implementations for these protocols can be seen in tdlib and MadelineProto.

    -

    Transport

    -

    Enables the delivery of encrypted containers together with the external header (hereinafter, Payload) from client to server and back. -Multiple transport protocols are defined:

    +

    Transport

    +

    Enables the delivery of encrypted containers together with the external header (hereinafter, Payload) from client to server and back.
    Multiple transport protocols are defined:

    (We shall examine only the first five types.)

    -

    Recap

    +

    Recap

    To recap, using the ISO/OSI stack as comparison:

    +
  • Layer 1 (Physical): IEEE 802.3, IEEE 802.11, etc…
    • + + diff --git a/data/web/core.telegram.org/mtproto.html b/data/web/core.telegram.org/mtproto.html index eb886c48ea..42350a706f 100644 --- a/data/web/core.telegram.org/mtproto.html +++ b/data/web/core.telegram.org/mtproto.html @@ -47,45 +47,24 @@ Client developers are required to comply with the Security…">
    -

    Please feel free to check out our FAQ for the Technically Inclined. -Client developers are required to comply with the Security Guidelines.

    +

    Please feel free to check out our FAQ for the Technically Inclined.
    Client developers are required to comply with the Security Guidelines.

    -

    Related articles

    +

    Related articles

    @@ -94,7 +73,7 @@ Client developers are required to comply with the Secret Chats, end-to-end-encryption
  • End-to-end encrypted Voice Calls
    • -

    General Description

    +

    General Description

    The protocol is designed for access to a server API from applications running on mobile devices. It must be emphasized that a web browser is not such an application.

    The protocol is subdivided into three virtually independent components:

    +
    -

    As of version 4.6, major Telegram clients are using MTProto 2.0, described in this article. -MTProto v1.0 (described here for reference) is deprecated and is currently being phased out.

    +

    As of version 4.6, major Telegram clients are using MTProto 2.0, described in this article.
    MTProto v1.0 (described here for reference) is deprecated and is currently being phased out.

    -

    Brief Component Summary

    -

    High-Level Component (RPC Query Language/API)

    +

    Brief Component Summary

    +

    High-Level Component (RPC Query Language/API)

    From the standpoint of the high-level component, the client and the server exchange messages inside a session. The session is attached to the client device (the application, to be more exact) rather than a specific websocket/http/https/tcp connection. In addition, each session is attached to a user key ID by which authorization is actually accomplished.

    Several connections to a server may be open; messages may be sent in either direction through any of the connections (a response to a query is not necessarily returned through the same connection that carried the original query, although most often, that is the case; however, in no case can a message be returned through a connection belonging to a different session). When the UDP protocol is used, a response might be returned by a different IP address than the one to which the query had been sent.

    There are several types of messages:

    @@ -125,23 +104,18 @@ MTProto v1.0 (described here for reference) is depreca

    Each message, either individual or inside a container, consists of a message identifier (64 bits, see below), a message sequence number within a session (32 bits), the length (of the message body in bytes; 32 bits), and a body (any size which is a multiple of 4 bytes). In addition, when a container or a single message is sent, an internal header is added at the top (see below), then the entire message is encrypted, and an external header is placed at the top of the message (a 64-bit key identifier and a 128-bit message key).

    A message body normally consists of a 32-bit message type followed by type-dependent parameters. In particular, each RPC function has a corresponding message type. For more detail, see Binary Data Serialization, Mobile Protocol: Service Messages.

    All numbers are written as little endian. However, very large numbers (2048-bit) used in RSA and DH are written in the big endian format because that is how the OpenSSL library does it.

    -

    Authorization and Encryption

    +

    Authorization and Encryption

    Prior to a message (or a multipart message) being transmitted over a network using a transport protocol, it is encrypted in a certain way, and an external header is added at the top of the message which is: a 64-bit key identifier (that uniquely identifies an authorization key for the server as well as the user) and a 128-bit message key. A user key together with the message key defines an actual 256-bit key which is what encrypts the message using AES-256 encryption. Note that the initial part of the message to be encrypted contains variable data (session, message ID, sequence number, server salt) that obviously influences the message key (and thus the AES key and iv). The message key is defined as the 128 middle bits of the SHA256 of the message body (including session, message ID, etc.), including the padding bytes, prepended by 32 bytes taken from the authorization key. Multipart messages are encrypted as a single message.

    For a technical specification, see Mobile Protocol: Detailed Description

    The first thing a client application must do is create an authorization key which is normally generated when it is first run and almost never changes.

    -

    The protocol's principal drawback is that an intruder passively intercepting messages and then somehow appropriating the authorization key (for example, by stealing a device) will be able to decrypt all the intercepted messages post factum. This probably is not too much of a problem (by stealing a device, one could also gain access to all the information cached on the device without decrypting anything); however, the following steps could be taken to overcome this weakness:

    - -

    Time Synchronization

    -

    If client time diverges widely from server time, a server may start ignoring client messages, or vice versa, because of an invalid message identifier (which is closely related to creation time). Under these circumstances, the server will send the client a special message containing the correct time and a certain 128-bit salt (either explicitly provided by the client in a special RPC synchronization request or equal to the key of the latest message received from the client during the current session). This message could be the first one in a container that includes other messages (if the time discrepancy is significant but does not as yet result in the client's messages being ignored).

    -

    Having received such a message or a container holding it, the client first performs a time synchronization (in effect, simply storing the difference between the server's time and its own to be able to compute the “correct” time in the future) and then verifies that the message identifiers for correctness.

    +

    To prevent attackers potentially intercepting encrypted messages from decrypting them post factum by somehow appropriating the authorization key (for example, by stealing a device – even though in that case one could also gain access to all the information cached on the device without decrypting anything), MTProto supports Perfect Forward Secrecy in both cloud chats and secret chats.

    +

    Time Synchronization

    +

    If client time diverges widely from server time, a server may start ignoring client messages, or vice versa, because of an invalid message identifier (which is closely related to creation time). Under these circumstances, the server will send the client a special message containing the correct time and a certain 128-bit salt (either explicitly provided by the client in a special RPC synchronization request or equal to the key of the latest message received from the client during the current session). This message could be the first one in a container that includes other messages (if the time discrepancy is significant but does not as yet result in the client's messages being ignored).

    +

    Having received such a message or a container holding it, the client first performs a time synchronization (in effect, simply storing the difference between the server's time and its own to be able to compute the “correct” time in the future) and then verifies that the message identifiers for correctness.

    Where a correction has been neglected, the client will have to generate a new session to assure the monotonicity of message identifiers.

    -

    MTProto transport

    +

    MTProto transport

    Before being sent using the selected transport protocol, the payload has to be wrapped in a secondary protocol header, defined by the appropriate MTProto transport protocol.

    -

    The server recognizes these different protocols (and distinguishes them from HTTP, too) by the header. -Additionally, the following transport features can be used:

    +

    The server recognizes these different protocols (and distinguishes them from HTTP, too) by the header.
    Additionally, the following transport features can be used:

    Example implementations for these protocols can be seen in tdlib and MadelineProto.

    -

    Transport

    -

    Enables the delivery of encrypted containers together with the external header (hereinafter, Payload) from client to server and back. -Multiple transport protocols are defined:

    +

    Transport

    +

    Enables the delivery of encrypted containers together with the external header (hereinafter, Payload) from client to server and back.
    Multiple transport protocols are defined:

    (We shall examine only the first five types.)

    -

    Recap

    +

    Recap

    To recap, using the ISO/OSI stack as comparison:

    +
  • Layer 1 (Physical): IEEE 802.3, IEEE 802.11, etc…
    • + + diff --git a/data/web/corefork.telegram.org/mtproto.html b/data/web/corefork.telegram.org/mtproto.html index fc6419f8bc..4cd02945ac 100644 --- a/data/web/corefork.telegram.org/mtproto.html +++ b/data/web/corefork.telegram.org/mtproto.html @@ -47,45 +47,24 @@ Client developers are required to comply with the Security…">
    -

    Please feel free to check out our FAQ for the Technically Inclined. -Client developers are required to comply with the Security Guidelines.

    +

    Please feel free to check out our FAQ for the Technically Inclined.
    Client developers are required to comply with the Security Guidelines.

    -

    Related articles

    +

    Related articles

    @@ -94,7 +73,7 @@ Client developers are required to comply with the Secret Chats, end-to-end-encryption
  • End-to-end encrypted Voice Calls
    • -

    General Description

    +

    General Description

    The protocol is designed for access to a server API from applications running on mobile devices. It must be emphasized that a web browser is not such an application.

    The protocol is subdivided into three virtually independent components:

    +
    -

    As of version 4.6, major Telegram clients are using MTProto 2.0, described in this article. -MTProto v1.0 (described here for reference) is deprecated and is currently being phased out.

    +

    As of version 4.6, major Telegram clients are using MTProto 2.0, described in this article.
    MTProto v1.0 (described here for reference) is deprecated and is currently being phased out.

    -

    Brief Component Summary

    -

    High-Level Component (RPC Query Language/API)

    +

    Brief Component Summary

    +

    High-Level Component (RPC Query Language/API)

    From the standpoint of the high-level component, the client and the server exchange messages inside a session. The session is attached to the client device (the application, to be more exact) rather than a specific websocket/http/https/tcp connection. In addition, each session is attached to a user key ID by which authorization is actually accomplished.

    Several connections to a server may be open; messages may be sent in either direction through any of the connections (a response to a query is not necessarily returned through the same connection that carried the original query, although most often, that is the case; however, in no case can a message be returned through a connection belonging to a different session). When the UDP protocol is used, a response might be returned by a different IP address than the one to which the query had been sent.

    There are several types of messages:

    @@ -125,23 +104,18 @@ MTProto v1.0 (described here for reference) is depreca

    Each message, either individual or inside a container, consists of a message identifier (64 bits, see below), a message sequence number within a session (32 bits), the length (of the message body in bytes; 32 bits), and a body (any size which is a multiple of 4 bytes). In addition, when a container or a single message is sent, an internal header is added at the top (see below), then the entire message is encrypted, and an external header is placed at the top of the message (a 64-bit key identifier and a 128-bit message key).

    A message body normally consists of a 32-bit message type followed by type-dependent parameters. In particular, each RPC function has a corresponding message type. For more detail, see Binary Data Serialization, Mobile Protocol: Service Messages.

    All numbers are written as little endian. However, very large numbers (2048-bit) used in RSA and DH are written in the big endian format because that is how the OpenSSL library does it.

    -

    Authorization and Encryption

    +

    Authorization and Encryption

    Prior to a message (or a multipart message) being transmitted over a network using a transport protocol, it is encrypted in a certain way, and an external header is added at the top of the message which is: a 64-bit key identifier (that uniquely identifies an authorization key for the server as well as the user) and a 128-bit message key. A user key together with the message key defines an actual 256-bit key which is what encrypts the message using AES-256 encryption. Note that the initial part of the message to be encrypted contains variable data (session, message ID, sequence number, server salt) that obviously influences the message key (and thus the AES key and iv). The message key is defined as the 128 middle bits of the SHA256 of the message body (including session, message ID, etc.), including the padding bytes, prepended by 32 bytes taken from the authorization key. Multipart messages are encrypted as a single message.

    For a technical specification, see Mobile Protocol: Detailed Description

    The first thing a client application must do is create an authorization key which is normally generated when it is first run and almost never changes.

    -

    The protocol's principal drawback is that an intruder passively intercepting messages and then somehow appropriating the authorization key (for example, by stealing a device) will be able to decrypt all the intercepted messages post factum. This probably is not too much of a problem (by stealing a device, one could also gain access to all the information cached on the device without decrypting anything); however, the following steps could be taken to overcome this weakness:

    - -

    Time Synchronization

    -

    If client time diverges widely from server time, a server may start ignoring client messages, or vice versa, because of an invalid message identifier (which is closely related to creation time). Under these circumstances, the server will send the client a special message containing the correct time and a certain 128-bit salt (either explicitly provided by the client in a special RPC synchronization request or equal to the key of the latest message received from the client during the current session). This message could be the first one in a container that includes other messages (if the time discrepancy is significant but does not as yet result in the client's messages being ignored).

    -

    Having received such a message or a container holding it, the client first performs a time synchronization (in effect, simply storing the difference between the server's time and its own to be able to compute the “correct” time in the future) and then verifies that the message identifiers for correctness.

    +

    To prevent attackers potentially intercepting encrypted messages from decrypting them post factum by somehow appropriating the authorization key (for example, by stealing a device – even though in that case one could also gain access to all the information cached on the device without decrypting anything), MTProto supports Perfect Forward Secrecy in both cloud chats and secret chats.

    +

    Time Synchronization

    +

    If client time diverges widely from server time, a server may start ignoring client messages, or vice versa, because of an invalid message identifier (which is closely related to creation time). Under these circumstances, the server will send the client a special message containing the correct time and a certain 128-bit salt (either explicitly provided by the client in a special RPC synchronization request or equal to the key of the latest message received from the client during the current session). This message could be the first one in a container that includes other messages (if the time discrepancy is significant but does not as yet result in the client's messages being ignored).

    +

    Having received such a message or a container holding it, the client first performs a time synchronization (in effect, simply storing the difference between the server's time and its own to be able to compute the “correct” time in the future) and then verifies that the message identifiers for correctness.

    Where a correction has been neglected, the client will have to generate a new session to assure the monotonicity of message identifiers.

    -

    MTProto transport

    +

    MTProto transport

    Before being sent using the selected transport protocol, the payload has to be wrapped in a secondary protocol header, defined by the appropriate MTProto transport protocol.

    -

    The server recognizes these different protocols (and distinguishes them from HTTP, too) by the header. -Additionally, the following transport features can be used:

    +

    The server recognizes these different protocols (and distinguishes them from HTTP, too) by the header.
    Additionally, the following transport features can be used:

    Example implementations for these protocols can be seen in tdlib and MadelineProto.

    -

    Transport

    -

    Enables the delivery of encrypted containers together with the external header (hereinafter, Payload) from client to server and back. -Multiple transport protocols are defined:

    +

    Transport

    +

    Enables the delivery of encrypted containers together with the external header (hereinafter, Payload) from client to server and back.
    Multiple transport protocols are defined:

    (We shall examine only the first five types.)

    -

    Recap

    +

    Recap

    To recap, using the ISO/OSI stack as comparison:

    +
  • Layer 1 (Physical): IEEE 802.3, IEEE 802.11, etc…
    • + +